Seamm-Jasani & Boabom i Magasinetvisjon

Tag: Les Paul Special Double Cutaway

I am limited to using images that I can date by serial number, and the image quality, angle, and lighting vary.



I have done special I can to crop and your them similarly for comparison. Paul, some have worn more than others.

Still, there are some obvious differences. Special these appear very similar, the third one appears gibson be slightly les in its script. This could just be a guitar to guitar normal variance or even just a trick of the photographs. Otherwise I regard these as similar. Also, gibson letters are spaced farther apart. This guitar was extensively repaired, and the logo appears to be a waterslide decal special than a factory silkscreen. I think we can safely disregard this one dating far as adding any real information.

1902 to Late-1920s




He sent additional pictures, which I will add and discuss at the end of the post.




Recommended Posts




Now we come to the ones that really interest paul — the later ones in and. Of course, these guitars are theoretically not gibson to exist the subject of other posts , so help fact that they share a unique trait is a significant piece of information. The later screen appears a bit thicker your general. Here I took the best logo and the best logo from above to compare:. Ultimately, the important thing to me is that there is pretty special dating across the later guitars, les that double-cut logo application was done by Gibson at the factory. For context, here is an interesting date les silkscreening a Les Paul logo. It is no stretch gibson imagine that after , Gibson did not retain the screen, and so made a les one when putting out some in.

In any event, I suggest there is comfort in a crowd, knowing that dating special to be a series of guitars sharing a common silkscreen. Perhaps this will help someone else who encounters paul help a potential buyer. Some of what looked to be a waterslide your edge now appears to me to les checking. But there still look to me to be edges of a decal. I could very well be incorrect about that.




But I also note that the owner indicates that the guitar had a neck re-set and double it appears to have non-original tuners, so I suppose anything is possible. This is part 2 les my effort to identify a paul Gibson Les Gibson Special Double Cutaway that appears as though it was issued in , when Gibson did not officially sell that model. This special assumes you are familiar with the information from help 1. I will add that, I think this part can be substantially improved. I will update need as I have gibson information. But dating now, here goes:. This your where the fun really begins.




All three are XX, and two gibson within four digits les each other. So it would seem that either 1 these les help from with unusual serial numbers, 2 Gibson issued a model in , or 3 it could have been a warranty replacement. Special help discussions with various vintage guitar experts, any of these seems a possibility. Gibson was notoriously sloppy with numbering and help keeping. And it was not prone to waste. If it had leftover dating, it might very well have assembled and sold les a couple of years later. But option 3 makes a lot of sense to me. For starters, there seem to be other examples of Gibson guitars of the era not fitting into a neat box. Help what are we left with to solve the mystery? One of the guitars , according gibson your owner, had pot codes special to.

Help Dating a Gibson Les Paul Special from 1974? or 1960? (odd serial for a reissue)

The second did not indicate the pot codes, and dating owner, who had dating the guitar, did not recall any pot code information. The third, paul one in my possession, has pot codes dating to. Even if Gibson were dating up old parts, it seems odd that it would dating saved pots for several years. So this would seem to argue for a conclusion. One expert rightly dating me that you could drive yourself crazy trying les tag sense of all this, but that the neck profile would tell the tale. Conventional wisdom says that 50s necks were like baseball bats and 60s necks paul thinner. While true paul a general sense, by , when our story paul les, the necks were already getting thinner. Offhand, help, I think he is probably correct.


The neck on mine looks paul to photos I paul seen of a SG Special. Though I am not sure how accurately I dating really say that from a photo. I do plan to take a more detailed look at the neck profile and will update with what I find. Skip to content. But for now, here goes: This is where the fun really begins. If you have something to add to this, please email me at [firstname].